Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:32

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Rocks reveal the turning point when oxygen changed Earth forever - Earth.com
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Mya Lesnar, daughter to WWE legend Brock Lesnar, wins national title in shot put - ESPN
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Mick Ralphs, Guitarist in Bad Company and Mott the Hoople, Dead at 81 - Rolling Stone
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
The Highest Prices You Can Get For Pokémon TCG's Destined Rivals - Kotaku
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.